Imagine a river passing through a town where every bridge was built to cross the water as it once flowed. Gradually, the current shifts, carrying more water towards one bank than the other. No single day appears to change the river, and every bridge remains where it was built. The landscape changes before anyone questions the map.
Now imagine each bridge keeper noticing a different change. One sees stronger currents, another notices eroding foundations, while a third sees no reason for concern. Each observation is reasonable, yet none captures the river’s movement as a whole. This is exactly how narrative drift begins in organisations.
Narrative drift rarely begins with an explicit rejection of strategy. The original direction remains documented, repeated, and formally endorsed. Yet changing circumstances give familiar words different meanings. Continuity of language can conceal divergence of interpretation.
One department may interpret growth as expansion, while another sees deeper penetration of existing markets. Both can point to the same strategic statement. Neither needs to misrepresent its meaning. The first fracture may lie in an unrecognised difference.
Every decision leaves a trace in organisational memory. People learn which priorities survive scrutiny, which trade-offs are rewarded, and which explanations work in their circumstances. These experiences shape how subsequent messages are understood. The narrative changes through accumulated interpretation, not announced revision.
Over time, people stop noticing that they are interpreting anything at all. Their understanding feels natural because experience has made it familiar. Meanwhile, other parts of the organisation develop equally convincing versions of the same direction. Local coherence can grow while organisational coherence diminishes.
Narratives are not carried by words alone. They depend on the assumptions people use to connect words with decisions, priorities, and consequences. When those assumptions diverge, the same strategy generates different actions. Narrative drift is meaning moving away from its original organising logic.
By the time conflicting outcomes become visible, each part may have acted consistently with its own understanding. What appears to be an execution problem may have begun much earlier, as shared meaning quietly separated from shared direction. The earliest sign of strategic drift may be a strategy everyone can repeat, but no longer understands in the same way.
Coming soon!