Why Do Organisations Defend What No Longer Works?
Imagine finding a path through a forest that has been cleared for decades. It is worn, familiar, and easy to follow, but it leads nowhere now. Nobody knows who made it, only that its existence feels like proof of its purpose. A path can become important simply because generations have walked it.
Now imagine someone suggesting that the path should disappear because it no longer leads anywhere. Others object: the path has always been there, people know it, and abandoning it would seem reckless. The more people defend it, the more its importance seems confirmed. This is exactly what happens in organisations when repetition begins to look like reason.
When History Looks Like Evidence
We often assume ineffective practices survive because nobody questions them. But questioning them can mean challenging decisions that once made perfect sense. History gives them legitimacy after their original conditions have changed. Yesterday’s wisdom can become today’s unquestioned evidence.
A process may have prevented a real risk. A reporting line may have resolved an ambiguity. A rule may have emerged from an expensive lesson, and nobody wants to forget it. The organisation may be protecting a memory of danger rather than responding to danger itself.
When Repetition Becomes Authority
Repeated use changes what a practice means. People stop seeing it as a response and start seeing it as how the organisation works. Familiarity makes alternatives feel less credible. Repetition can quietly turn a historical choice into organisational authority.
Evidence that something no longer works may not settle the argument. The practice carries more than its visible function. It carries precedent, caution, identity, and the memory of what happened when the organisation once chose differently. What is being defended may be the meaning of the practice, not the practice itself.
When the Old Path Still Shapes the Journey
The revealing question is not, “Why are we still doing this?” It is, “What past judgement made this worth preserving?” That question takes us beneath the practice towards the conditions that gave it meaning. Sometimes organisational momentum is yesterday’s reasoning continuing after yesterday has disappeared.
Once this becomes visible, resistance looks different. People may be defending continuity with something the organisation once learned the hard way. The lesson can remain alive long after its circumstances have gone. An organisation can become loyal to an old answer without noticing that the question has changed.
PREVIOUS ESSAY
NEXT ESSAY
Coming soon!