What If Organisational Coping Is Preventing Change?
Imagine an old mechanical clock that has begun losing time. Its owner discovers that tapping its wooden casing makes it run accurately for a few hours. Soon, he knows exactly where and when to tap. A temporary workaround becomes the clock’s operating ritual.
Years pass, and the owner becomes skilled at keeping the clock on time. Visitors admire its reliability, unaware of its deterioration. Repair would mean abandoning a familiar routine. This is exactly how coping can prevent organisations from repairing what is failing.
When Coping Looks Like Capability
Organisations rarely stop functioning when things go wrong. People compensate, improvise, and find informal ways to keep work moving. A department corrects another’s errors, while a manager quietly resolves problems that never reach the formal system. Operational competence may actually be continuous compensation for structural weakness.
Because the work gets done, the underlying problem attracts little attention. Reports capture output, rarely the invisible effort behind it. Those who keep things running may become its most valued people. Success can conceal the conditions that make it increasingly difficult to sustain.
How Coping Becomes Entrenched
Every workaround teaches people how to live with a problem. People learn whom to approach, which procedures to bypass, and which promises to distrust. These adaptations become embedded in relationships, expectations, and everyday decisions. The organisation develops a second operating system beneath its formal one.
This invisible system can be remarkably resilient. Policies change and processes are redesigned, yet familiar compensations persist. Not necessarily because they oppose change, but because new arrangements have not addressed why coping became necessary. The old organisation survives inside the routines of the new one.
When Adaptation Blocks Transformation
Here is the paradox. An organisation may appear resistant when it has become adept at absorbing disruption without changing its structure. Coping reduces the urgency to reconsider it. Adaptation can become the mechanism through which stagnation protects itself.
Sub-Surface Strategy™ examines what visible adjustments are compensating for. The question is not simply why people continue doing things the old way, but what would stop working if they stopped. This reveals dependencies that formal strategy may never recognise. Sometimes the greatest obstacle to transformation is not resistance to change, but the success of coping with the absence of it.
PREVIOUS ESSAY
NEXT ESSAY
Coming soon!